<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Automatic summarization in RIP and EIGRP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.networkers-online.com/blog/2008/07/automatic-summarization-in-rip-and-eigrp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.networkers-online.com/blog/2008/07/automatic-summarization-in-rip-and-eigrp/</link>
	<description>Networkers&#039; Home on the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 20:34:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohamed Kamal</title>
		<link>http://www.networkers-online.com/blog/2008/07/automatic-summarization-in-rip-and-eigrp/comment-page-1/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohamed Kamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkers-online.com/blog/?p=11#comment-990</guid>
		<description>Dear Wael, 

Sorry if the question isn&#039;t related to EIGRP summerization. But it&#039;s, generally speaking, about EIGRP.

I know that we can advertise default routes into an EIGRP domain by any of the following:

1- Static default router and redistributes it under the EIGRP process.
2- Using the IP default-network.

I&#039;ve tried the first option and it worked, everything is alright regardless of the AD of 170! But when I tried the IP default-network command, I reached the following:

R1#sh run

interface Loopback0
 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial0/0
 ip address 172.12.123.1 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation frame-relay
 frame-relay interface-dlci 102
 frame-relay interface-dlci 103
!
interface Serial0/1
 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
router eigrp 1
 network 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
 network 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
 network 172.12.123.0 0.0.0.255
 no auto-summary
!
ip http server
ip classless
ip default-network 10.0.0.0



R1#sh ip route

Gateway of last resort is not set

     1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       1.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
     2.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D       2.2.2.0 [90/2297856] via 172.12.123.2, 00:26:41, Serial0/0
     3.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D       3.3.3.0 [90/2297856] via 172.12.123.3, 00:26:41, Serial0/0
     4.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D       4.4.4.0 [90/2300416] via 172.12.123.3, 00:26:41, Serial0/0
                [90/2300416] via 172.12.123.2, 00:26:41, Serial0/0
     5.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D       5.5.5.0 [90/2297856] via 10.1.1.5, 00:00:52, Serial0/1
     172.12.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
D       172.12.34.0 [90/2172416] via 172.12.123.3, 00:26:41, Serial0/0
                    [90/2172416] via 172.12.123.2, 00:26:41, Serial0/0
C       172.12.123.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
 *   10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       10.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0/1

Notice that there is no &quot;ip route&quot; statement created and also there is no route marked as candidate default! 

So what is the problem? 

- will I have to adjust the prefix of the network 10.0.0.0/24 at the interface to be /8 for the EIGRP to know about and then use it as a default network? .. I guess not!

- will I have to adjust the network command under the EIGRP to include the /8 prefix network instead of /24 prefix and then EIGRP will now know about the network and use it with ip default-network? .. I guess not!

NOTE: I hope that you can write a post about IGPs and Candidate Default Routes! especially using the ip default-network as they are tend to be confusing.

Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Wael, </p>
<p>Sorry if the question isn&#8217;t related to EIGRP summerization. But it&#8217;s, generally speaking, about EIGRP.</p>
<p>I know that we can advertise default routes into an EIGRP domain by any of the following:</p>
<p>1- Static default router and redistributes it under the EIGRP process.<br />
2- Using the IP default-network.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried the first option and it worked, everything is alright regardless of the AD of 170! But when I tried the IP default-network command, I reached the following:</p>
<p>R1#sh run</p>
<p>interface Loopback0<br />
 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0<br />
!<br />
interface Serial0/0<br />
 ip address 172.12.123.1 255.255.255.0<br />
 encapsulation frame-relay<br />
 frame-relay interface-dlci 102<br />
 frame-relay interface-dlci 103<br />
!<br />
interface Serial0/1<br />
 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0<br />
!<br />
router eigrp 1<br />
 network 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255<br />
 network 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255<br />
 network 172.12.123.0 0.0.0.255<br />
 no auto-summary<br />
!<br />
ip http server<br />
ip classless<br />
ip default-network 10.0.0.0</p>
<p>R1#sh ip route</p>
<p>Gateway of last resort is not set</p>
<p>     1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets<br />
C       1.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback0<br />
     2.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets<br />
D       2.2.2.0 [90/2297856] via 172.12.123.2, 00:26:41, Serial0/0<br />
     3.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets<br />
D       3.3.3.0 [90/2297856] via 172.12.123.3, 00:26:41, Serial0/0<br />
     4.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets<br />
D       4.4.4.0 [90/2300416] via 172.12.123.3, 00:26:41, Serial0/0<br />
                [90/2300416] via 172.12.123.2, 00:26:41, Serial0/0<br />
     5.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets<br />
D       5.5.5.0 [90/2297856] via 10.1.1.5, 00:00:52, Serial0/1<br />
     172.12.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets<br />
D       172.12.34.0 [90/2172416] via 172.12.123.3, 00:26:41, Serial0/0<br />
                    [90/2172416] via 172.12.123.2, 00:26:41, Serial0/0<br />
C       172.12.123.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0<br />
 *   10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets<br />
C       10.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0/1</p>
<p>Notice that there is no &#8220;ip route&#8221; statement created and also there is no route marked as candidate default! </p>
<p>So what is the problem? </p>
<p>- will I have to adjust the prefix of the network 10.0.0.0/24 at the interface to be /8 for the EIGRP to know about and then use it as a default network? .. I guess not!</p>
<p>- will I have to adjust the network command under the EIGRP to include the /8 prefix network instead of /24 prefix and then EIGRP will now know about the network and use it with ip default-network? .. I guess not!</p>
<p>NOTE: I hope that you can write a post about IGPs and Candidate Default Routes! especially using the ip default-network as they are tend to be confusing.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.networkers-online.com/blog/2008/07/automatic-summarization-in-rip-and-eigrp/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkers-online.com/blog/?p=11#comment-129</guid>
		<description>save to my Bookmarks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>save to my Bookmarks <img src='http://www.networkers-online.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
