<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Configure Frame-relay interfaces</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.networkers-online.com/blog/2008/07/how-to-configure-frame-relay-interfaces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.networkers-online.com/blog/2008/07/how-to-configure-frame-relay-interfaces/</link>
	<description>Networkers&#039; Home on the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 20:34:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nakato</title>
		<link>http://www.networkers-online.com/blog/2008/07/how-to-configure-frame-relay-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-6017</link>
		<dc:creator>nakato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 11:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkers-online.com/blog/?p=5#comment-6017</guid>
		<description>thax alot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thax alot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.networkers-online.com/blog/2008/07/how-to-configure-frame-relay-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 06:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkers-online.com/blog/?p=5#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>Hi Kamal,

The &quot;frame-relay interface-dlci&quot; command is used when we make point-to-point sub-interfaces. For point-to-point sub-interfaces, we must use this &quot;frame-relay interface-dlci&quot; statement. We cannot use the &quot;frame-relay map&quot; command. The &quot;frame-relay map&quot; command can be used for physical interfaces (e.g. serial 0/0) or multipoint sub-interfaces (e.g. serial 0/0.1 multipoint). We usually make use of sub-interfaces to get around the split-horizon non-advertisement problem.

NBMA is used to denote technologies like frame-relay. As an example, if we typed, &quot;no frame-relay inverse-arp&quot; (see Task 1 above), and then followed with a frame map statement, e.g. &quot;frame-relay map ip 10.10.12.2 102&quot; without the broadcast parameter, this is an acceptable statement, i.e. . We can sent pings around, but note that ping is unicast. When we try to run our dynamic routing protocol over this NBMA (say frame-relay) network, we are not able to do so. Why? Remember that we left out the broadcast parameter of the &quot;frame-relay map&quot; statement. Taking RIP as an example, RIP V1 is broadcast and RIP V2 is multicast (224.0.0.9). As the names NBMA (non-broadcast multiple access) denotes, it does not work. Try comparing this with a broadcast medium e.g. Ethernet.

I hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kamal,</p>
<p>The &#8220;frame-relay interface-dlci&#8221; command is used when we make point-to-point sub-interfaces. For point-to-point sub-interfaces, we must use this &#8220;frame-relay interface-dlci&#8221; statement. We cannot use the &#8220;frame-relay map&#8221; command. The &#8220;frame-relay map&#8221; command can be used for physical interfaces (e.g. serial 0/0) or multipoint sub-interfaces (e.g. serial 0/0.1 multipoint). We usually make use of sub-interfaces to get around the split-horizon non-advertisement problem.</p>
<p>NBMA is used to denote technologies like frame-relay. As an example, if we typed, &#8220;no frame-relay inverse-arp&#8221; (see Task 1 above), and then followed with a frame map statement, e.g. &#8220;frame-relay map ip 10.10.12.2 102&#8243; without the broadcast parameter, this is an acceptable statement, i.e. . We can sent pings around, but note that ping is unicast. When we try to run our dynamic routing protocol over this NBMA (say frame-relay) network, we are not able to do so. Why? Remember that we left out the broadcast parameter of the &#8220;frame-relay map&#8221; statement. Taking RIP as an example, RIP V1 is broadcast and RIP V2 is multicast (224.0.0.9). As the names NBMA (non-broadcast multiple access) denotes, it does not work. Try comparing this with a broadcast medium e.g. Ethernet.</p>
<p>I hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohamed Kamal</title>
		<link>http://www.networkers-online.com/blog/2008/07/how-to-configure-frame-relay-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohamed Kamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://networkers-online.com/blog/?p=5#comment-888</guid>
		<description>Dear Wael, 

Thanks for the post :) but I have a question to sort this topic out.

1- Why do we need to assign interface DLCI when using sub interfaces? Is it because:

- ILMI doesn&#039;t work, somehow, correctly with sub interfaces affecting automatic assignment of DLCIs from the local FR switch?

- Sub interface is by default a point to point network type, but if configured as a multipoint type, it should work fine?

What I want to know here is that: Is the physical &quot;mutlipoint&quot; or sub interface &quot;multipoint&quot; working as one BIG exiting interface which has some logical ones, and to send data using this &quot;one big interface&quot;, weather it&#039;s a physical or multipoint subinterface, it should be assigned to a &quot;small logical one&quot; which is DLCI?

2- What is the difference between using Multipoing and NMBA in OSPF design? If the full mesh is not an issue?

Thanks for your time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Wael, </p>
<p>Thanks for the post <img src='http://www.networkers-online.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  but I have a question to sort this topic out.</p>
<p>1- Why do we need to assign interface DLCI when using sub interfaces? Is it because:</p>
<p>- ILMI doesn&#8217;t work, somehow, correctly with sub interfaces affecting automatic assignment of DLCIs from the local FR switch?</p>
<p>- Sub interface is by default a point to point network type, but if configured as a multipoint type, it should work fine?</p>
<p>What I want to know here is that: Is the physical &#8220;mutlipoint&#8221; or sub interface &#8220;multipoint&#8221; working as one BIG exiting interface which has some logical ones, and to send data using this &#8220;one big interface&#8221;, weather it&#8217;s a physical or multipoint subinterface, it should be assigned to a &#8220;small logical one&#8221; which is DLCI?</p>
<p>2- What is the difference between using Multipoing and NMBA in OSPF design? If the full mesh is not an issue?</p>
<p>Thanks for your time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
