Comments on: Static Routes Label Binding http://www.networkers-online.com/blog/2009/01/static-routes-label-mapping-in-mpls/ Networkers' Home on the Internet Thu, 24 Nov 2011 20:34:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Option 2 (10B): ASBR-to-ASBR / MP-eBGP for VPNv4 – Inter-AS MPLS VPN | ASPIRANT http://www.networkers-online.com/blog/2009/01/static-routes-label-mapping-in-mpls/comment-page-1/#comment-2288 Option 2 (10B): ASBR-to-ASBR / MP-eBGP for VPNv4 – Inter-AS MPLS VPN | ASPIRANT Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:49:50 +0000 http://networkers-online.com/blog/?p=142#comment-2288 [...] or point-to-point, below is a brief for all the cases, for more information please check the Static Routes Label Binding [...] [...] or point-to-point, below is a brief for all the cases, for more information please check the Static Routes Label Binding [...]

]]> By: Nenad http://www.networkers-online.com/blog/2009/01/static-routes-label-mapping-in-mpls/comment-page-1/#comment-1350 Nenad Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:10:02 +0000 http://networkers-online.com/blog/?p=142#comment-1350 Mohamed I am not sure that what you described under A) Static route pointing to the outgoing interface is the correct behavior PHP router will remove the label before sending the packet but it already knows next-hop interface (from LFIB) and will not do L3 lookup for the ip packet (IP destination) Mohamed

I am not sure that what you described under A) Static route pointing to the outgoing interface is the correct behavior
PHP router will remove the label before sending the packet but it already knows next-hop interface (from LFIB) and will not do L3 lookup for the ip packet (IP destination)

]]>